跳到正文
Raffaele Colombo· @raffcolo · X·· 2 天前评分70
正文 · 原文

Puzzling to see cathepsin B (CTSB) enrichment in Mo-Rez responders, given that the GGFG linker is a substrate of cathepsin L, not B.

CTSL should have been included at a minimum.

#ESMO26

240 浏览 · 6 赞 · 3 转发 · 1 回复

帖内回复
  1. Dennis Kwiatkowski@KwiatBerlin

    @raffcolo True, but CTSB can cleave this sequence - leaving glycin-exatecan (evident with DE-310), which should however be less potent than free exatecan released from CTSL. Given that both CTSL and CTsB are expressed in PROC I guess you have a mixture of cleaved payloads.

来源:Raffaele Colombo · x.com

CBACBA Frontier Insights (CFI)美国华人生物医药科技协会(CBA)www.cba-usa.org

免责声明 CBA Frontier Insights 使用 AI 技术对公开来源的生物医药信息进行整理、摘要和分析。内容仅供科研交流与信息参考,不代表原始发布方或相关机构的官方观点。AI 生成内容可能存在误差,重要信息请以原始来源为准。相关知识产权归各自权利人所有。 如有版权或内容异议,请通过网站反馈页面联系我们。