
ESMO 2026
2026 年 10 月 23–27 日 · Madrid · 共 4873 条
INTERPATH-001
★★★63 人 · 90 条
本事件热度走势
当前热度 4·可比范围峰值 4(10月27日 01:00)·近 24 小时可比范围变化 –·当前参与者 7
切除后 IIB–IV 期黑色素瘤,辅助帕博利珠单抗已经是标准之一。KEYNOTE-942 是随机 IIb 期:个体化新抗原 mRNA(当时代号 mRNA-4157 / V940)加帕博利珠单抗对比单药,Lancet 2024 报的是无复发生存,不是总生存。[1] 2026 年 JCO 有五年更新。[2] 那些是 II 期数字,不是这次 III 期。
INTerpath-001(NCT05933577)是它的 III 期后续,不是同一项试验:intismeran autogene 加帕博利珠单抗对比单用帕博利珠单抗。会场 LBA1(Presidential I)报 n=1137,无复发生存风险比 0.58,2 年无复发生存 82.2% 对 70.0%;远处无转移生存同步达到;总生存随访未成熟。现场写无新的安全性信号。完整置信区间、分期和 BRAF 分层以幻灯为准。
它相对 942 推进的是把同一组合做到 1137 人的 III 期,并且无复发生存和远处无转移生存都达到。总生存未成熟,不能把风险比 0.58 写成已经改写辅助黑色素瘤标准治疗。个体化 mRNA 的可及性、周转时间和费用,现场帖没有给。会上数字与 942 的期刊数字分开读,不叠成一条。
Adam Feuerstein ✡️@adamfeuerstein ESMO - Eur. Oncology@myESMO Adam Feuerstein ✡️@adamfeuerstein Sumanta K. Pal, MD, FASCO@montypal Mario Balsa@MarioBalsaMD 引用@#ESMO26: The embargo on LBA1, “INTerpath-001: Phase 3 study of the mRNA-based individualised neoantigen therapy intismeran autogene plus pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab alone for adjuvant treatment of resected stage IIB-IV melanoma”, has been breached. As the data are now publicly available, ESMO has released the information contained in the abstract and has lifted the embargo on the full dataset.
Mario Balsa@MarioBalsaMD Dr. Estela Rodriguez@Latinamd Yago Garitaonaindía@YGaritaonaindia Toni Choueiri, MD@DrChoueiri JNCI@JNCI_Now MarioBalsaMD@MarioBalsaMD Tian Zhang, MD, MHS, FASCO (@tiansterzhangmd.bsky)@TiansterZhang @tonichoueiri分享关于新抗原mRNA疫苗的肿瘤内科要点。未来正在到来——尤其是随着INTERPATH-001试验结果在本届#ESMO26公布 @myESMO @oncoalert
boutrosand@boutrosand Lung Cancer Europe@LungCancerEu ESMO - Eur. Oncology@myESMO OncoAlert@OncoAlert Pablo Jiménez@PaulJiL Alfredo Addeo MD@Alfdoc2 Martín Angel@Martin_AngelMD Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD@to_be_elizabeth 引用@🎥 #OAOnTheGO | OncoAlert at #ESMO26 Madrid INTerpath-001 is positive! 🔬 @ProfGLongMIA @jasonlukemd Dr. Mario Balsa (@HospitalClínic Barcelona) discusses pembrolizumab + personalized mRNA vaccine V940 in resected melanoma. 📊 2-year RFS: 82% vs 60% (HR 0.58) 📊 DMFS: 88.5% vs 80.2% (HR 0.62) Will this translate into longer survival? Who benefits most? And how does it fit with neoadjuvant immunotherapy? 🎬 Watch now! #Melanoma #OncoAlert @DrBetofMDPhD, @cdanicas, @matteolambe, @NiuSanford, @GlopesMd, @PGrivasMDPhD, @brian_rini, @to_be_elizabeth, @ElisaAgostinett, @nataliagandur, @UOzkerim, @DrMirallas, @DrYukselUrun, @Lucarecco, @mzugman, @HHorinouchi, @p_ciracimd, @DraMartinezLago, @DrVilmaPBarcia, @GIMedOnc, @MarioBalsaMD, @scocmem, @AmandaNizamMD, @GaiaGriguolo, @JankovicK, @Dr_Oncologista, @Erman_Akkus, @WeOncologists, @niklas_kluemper, @Markuseckstein
KOL Pulse AI@KolPulseAI ozdogan_md@ozdogan_md SEOM@_SEOM Jacob Plieth@JacobPlieth #Esmo26 讨论嘉宾 Inge Marie Svane 就 Interpath-001 与新辅助 Opdivo + Yervoy(Nadina 研究)展开讨论 $MRNA $MRK
Yüksel Ürün@DrYukselUrun Yakup Ergün@dr_yakupergun KOL Pulse AI@KolPulseAI Dra. María Natalia Gandur Quiroga@nataliagandur 引用@🎥 #OAOnTheGO | OncoAlert at #ESMO26 Madrid INTerpath-001 is positive! 🔬 @ProfGLongMIA @jasonlukemd Dr. Mario Balsa (@HospitalClínic Barcelona) discusses pembrolizumab + personalized mRNA vaccine V940 in resected melanoma. 📊 2-year RFS: 82% vs 60% (HR 0.58) 📊 DMFS: 88.5% vs 80.2% (HR 0.62) Will this translate into longer survival? Who benefits most? And how does it fit with neoadjuvant immunotherapy? 🎬 Watch now! #Melanoma #OncoAlert @DrBetofMDPhD, @cdanicas, @matteolambe, @NiuSanford, @GlopesMd, @PGrivasMDPhD, @brian_rini, @to_be_elizabeth, @ElisaAgostinett, @nataliagandur, @UOzkerim, @DrMirallas, @DrYukselUrun, @Lucarecco, @mzugman, @HHorinouchi, @p_ciracimd, @DraMartinezLago, @DrVilmaPBarcia, @GIMedOnc, @MarioBalsaMD, @scocmem, @AmandaNizamMD, @GaiaGriguolo, @JankovicK, @Dr_Oncologista, @Erman_Akkus, @WeOncologists, @niklas_kluemper, @Markuseckstein
OncoAlert@OncoAlert 引用@It was a great honour to present the results of the phase 3 INTerpath-001 clinical trial at the #ESMO26 Congress in Madrid. This international trial included 1137 patients, across 157 sites, whose melanoma had been surgically removed, but who were at very high risk of it returning. The trial showed adding #intismeran autogene, an mRNA based individualised neoantigen therapy, to pembrolizumab reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 42%. This is the first phase 3 study to show that a treatment built from the unique ‘fingerprint’ of a patient’s own tumour can reduce the risk of recurrence or death from cancer. That fingerprint is read by sequencing the tumour, then a ‘wanted poster’ of the cancer is made as mRNA, showing the immune system exactly what to look for and attack. Having succeeded in melanoma, this proof of concept could mark the beginning of a foundational shift in how we treat cancer. Read more >https://melanoma.org.au/news/personalised-cancer-vaccine-cuts-risk-of-melanoma-recurrence/ A huge thank you to all patients and teams involved. @myESMO @Sydney_Uni @syd_health @Science_Academy @AAHMS_health @FulbrightAUS @NthSydHealth @ausoftheyear
Dr. Estela Rodriguez@Latinamd 引用@So the “not-so-official-anymore“ presentation is in: The melanoma vaccine works. We knew that, 82% recurrence-free at two years vs 70% with immunotherapy alone. It's built individually for each patient, the logistics are enormous: Sequence their tumor, design the vaccine, manufacture it for one person. Weeks of work that will cost a fortune. A treatment like that doesn't scale to most of the world. It scales to countries that can afford a factory run per patient. I live in a country which happens to be able to afford that, most countries can’t. Melanoma kills people everywhere. This will reach a fraction of them. Solving cancer and solving access are two different problems. We just got better at the first one.