跳到正文
Jeff Ryckman· @jryckman3 · X·· 12 小时前评分60
正文 · 原文

GY020 didn't meet its primary endpoint: 3y success 70% w/ pembro+RT vs 73% RT alone. Leaving study counted as failure. KM RFS numerically favored pembro, but CI crossed 1. G3/4 toxicity 43% vs 15%. RT alone remains my default here. #ESMO26 #radonc https://t.co/tmjNMzulqN https://t.co/KR1rbuVzhW

热度 0 · 0 赞 · 0 回复 · 0 转发

来源:Jeff Ryckman · x.com

CBACBA Frontier Insights (CFI)美国华人生物医药科技协会(CBA)www.cba-usa.org