跳到正文
Jeff Ryckman· @jryckman3 · X·· 12 小时前评分60
正文 · 原文

FURTHER enrolled 69/129 planned pts. At 2wk, pain response 50% in pooled MR-HIFU arms vs 38% with EBRT (P=.41). Just refer these folks for EBRT. Most data for invasive ablation is confounded by receipt of EBRT. Love me some kypho after EBRT (for select cases), though #ESMO26 #radonc https://t.co/D7WeSP7cEe

热度 2 · 2 赞 · 0 回复 · 0 转发

来源:Jeff Ryckman · x.com

CBACBA Frontier Insights (CFI)美国华人生物医药科技协会(CBA)www.cba-usa.org