Skip to content
mp.weixin.qq.com·· 6 hours agoPickScore79

Single-dose trial interim analysis shows Wantai's Cecolin 9 beats Gardasil 9 on antibodies against 7 high-risk HPV types

In brief

An interim analysis of a single-dose trial of Wantai's 9-valent HPV vaccine Cecolin 9 showed IgG geometric mean concentrations significantly higher than Merck's Gardasil 9 for all 7 high-risk oncogenic HPV types. The international multicenter study enrolled young women aged 9-20, and PATH presented the month-6 results at IPVS 2026. Safety profiles were generally comparable between the two groups.

Deep dive

The domestically developed 9-valent HPV vaccine Cecolin 9 (Xiamen Innovax/Wantai Biological) has entered a stage where commercialization and clinical evidence advance in parallel. The vaccine was licensed in China in May 2025 and covers the same nine HPV genotypes as Merck's Gardasil 9 [Industry Media·E]; its Phase III clinical data show a favorable safety profile, clear immunogenicity, and high protective efficacy against vaccine-targeted HPV types [Industry Media·C]. In addition, a lot-to-lot consistency clinical trial of the vaccine is underway, planning to enroll 720 participants, with the primary endpoint being the geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of neutralizing antibodies to HPV6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 one month after full vaccination (Month 7), sponsored by Xiamen Innovax Biotech Co., Ltd .

The key facts of this news: at the 38th International Papillomavirus Conference (IPVS 2026) held in Athens, Greece, PATH (Program for Appropriate Technology in Health, USA) presented 6-month interim results from an international Phase III multicenter clinical study evaluating a single-dose schedule of the 9-valent HPV vaccine. The data show that in young women aged 9-20 who received a single dose of the domestic Wantai 9-valent HPV vaccine Cecolin 9, the IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) against 7 high-risk oncogenic HPV types were all significantly higher than Merck's Gardasil 9, with overall comparable safety. According to concurrent reports, the study is a Phase III, double-blind, randomized, multinational study in Ghana and the Philippines comparing the immunogenicity and safety of a single-dose schedule [Industry Media·G].

Relative to existing materials, these results advance Cecolin 9's evidence chain from the same-manufacturer Phase III and lot-to-lot consistency studies to a head-to-head comparison with the imported 9-valent vaccine under a single-dose schedule. A randomized blinded trial launched in 2023 had already compared the immunogenicity of the E. coli-produced 9-valent HPV vaccine with Gardasil 9 at a non-inferiority margin of -5% [Industry Media·F]; this interim analysis further shows that under a single-dose schedule the IgG GMCs for 7 high-risk types were significantly higher than the comparator, and the disclosure was led by PATH, an international public health organization, providing new comparative evidence for the domestic 9-valent vaccine in the single-dose scenario, a key setting for global cervical cancer elimination strategies (needs verification).

Undisclosed information includes: the exact enrollment number of the head-to-head study, the specific GMC values and confidence intervals by type, follow-up duration and final analysis timing, and whether and when the single-dose schedule will be submitted for regulatory approval—all pending confirmation. Follow-ups to watch include full data publication of this study, longer-term follow-up results, and regulatory and market progress in additional countries (needs verification).

Why it matters

Head-to-head interim analysis directly compares single-dose Cecolin 9 with Gardasil 9, reporting IgG and safety data for 7 high-risk types.

Source: mp.weixin.qq.com · mp.weixin.qq.com

CBACBA Frontier Insights (CFI)Chinese Biopharmaceutical Association (CBA)www.cba-usa.org

Disclaimer CBA Frontier Insights uses AI-assisted methods to aggregate, summarize, and analyze publicly accessible biopharmaceutical information. Content is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not represent the official views of original sources or affiliated organizations. AI-generated content may contain errors; please verify important information against primary sources. Intellectual property rights remain with their respective owners. For copyright concerns or corrections, please contact us through the website’s feedback page.