Skip to content

ESMO Congress 2026

October 23–27, 2026 · Madrid · 5018 items

← All topics

FOURLIGHT-1

★★★

26 people · 27 posts

Deep dive

The treatment landscape of HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer has been established by CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib) [9], but acquired resistance remains a major challenge [9]; after adjuvant CDK4/6i, nearly 10% of patients recur during or shortly after treatment, and the efficacy of post-relapse therapy is largely unknown [10]. Current post-progression strategies are mainly biomarker-driven: next-generation oral SERDs for ESR1-mutated disease, alpelisib or capivasertib plus fulvestrant for PIK3CA-AKT-PTEN pathway alterations, and early transition to ADCs such as T-DXd for rapid progression or visceral disease [12]. Atirmociclib is described in the literature as a potential first-in-class inhibitor with significantly greater selectivity for CDK4 over CDK6; its phase 1/2a combination with endocrine therapy was well tolerated and showed antitumor activity [7].

FOURLIGHT-1, presented at ESMO 2026 in Proffered Paper 2 (abstract 1842O), is an open-label randomized phase 2 study [1][7]: patients with HR+/HER2− advanced/metastatic breast cancer progressing after adjuvant or first-line CDK4/6i were randomized 1:1 to atirmociclib (300 mg orally, twice daily, continuously) plus fulvestrant or investigator's choice (fulvestrant alone or everolimus plus exemestane), with investigator-assessed PFS as the primary endpoint; 263 patients were enrolled (126 vs 137; median age 57 years; data cutoff 12 January 2026) [7]. Numbers reported at the meeting: median PFS 9.4 vs 6.6 months, HR 0.60 (0.440–0.825), p=0.0007; ORR 19.3% vs 11.3%; CBR 61.9% vs 46.0%; neutropenia was the most common TRAE, discontinuation due to TRAEs was only 4.0%, though grade ≥3 AEs were more frequent. Live posts also noted simultaneous publication in Ann Oncol [7] and an ongoing phase 3 trial of atirmociclib in the first-line setting.

The main-site Chinese industry news independently covered the same direction: three 2026 ESMO abstracts focus on subsequent therapy for HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer after CDK4/6i progression, involving atirmociclib, abemaciclib, and giredestrant combination regimens, respectively. This is consistent with the live information, placing FOURLIGHT-1 within the same competitive lane, but it added no new figures.

Relative to existing knowledge, the step forward from FOURLIGHT-1 is that after CDK4/6i progression, selectively inhibiting CDK4 alone plus fulvestrant still delivered a roughly 3-month PFS difference and a statistically significant HR, suggesting CDK4 remains a suppressible target in this resistance context, and the 4.0% discontinuation rate hints at potentially better tolerability—directly answering the question posed at the meeting of whether selective CDK4 inhibition can overcome CDK4/6i resistance. The limitations are equally clear: this is an open-label phase 2 with investigator-assessed PFS as the primary endpoint [7], and several live commentators emphasized the need for phase 3 validation; OS, DOR and other secondary endpoint results, as well as the breakdown between the two regimens within the investigator's-choice arm, were not disclosed in the available materials.

References
  1. 1.1842O Efficacy and safety of atirmociclib (ATI) + fulvestrant (FUL) in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2– advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who progressed on prior CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in a randomized phase 2 study (FOU… · ESMO 2026 2026
  2. 2.LBA14 A double-blind placebo controlled randomized phase III trial of fulvestrant and ipatasertib as treatment for HER-2 negative and estrogen receptor positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Overall survival results of… · ESMO 2026 2026
  3. 3.LBA15 Anbenitamab plus albumin-bound docetaxel in patients (pts) with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (BC): A randomized phase III study · ESMO 2026 2026
  4. 4.LBA26 Short-term preoperative durvalumab for stage I TNBC: First results from the phase II UNLOCK 14 - POP-DURVA trial · ESMO 2026 2026
  5. 5.LBA51 Results from KEYNOTE-B49: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of pembrolizumab (pembro) vs placebo (pbo) plus chemotherapy (CT) in participants (pts) with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC) · ESMO 2026 2026
  6. 6.LBA96 First-line (1L) datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) vs chemotherapy in patients (pts) with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) for whom immunotherapy was not an option: Explorat… · ESMO 2026 2026
  7. 7.Atirmociclib and fulvestrant for patients with HR+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer who progressed on a prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor: primary analysis of the randomized FourLight-1 trial · Ann Oncol 2026
  8. 8.Breast Cancer: Molecular Pathogenesis, Targeted Therapy, Screening, and Prevention · MedComm (2020) 2026
  9. 9.Alternate actions of CDK4/6 inhibitors beyond cell cycle blockade: unexplored roles in therapy resistance · Cancer Metastasis Rev 2025
  10. 10.Managing relapses during or after adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer: an emerging challenge · ESMO Open 2025
  11. 11.WITHDRAWN: From CDK4/6 to CDK2 and KAT: Evolving therapeutic approaches in HR+/HER2- breast cancer · Breast 2026
  12. 12.Beyond CDK4/6 Inhibition: Current Strategies in Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer · Curr Treat Options Oncol 2026
Floor
  1. Dra. María Natalia Gandur Quiroga

    🧬 After progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor, is it time to rethink whether the class can still work?

    引用@

    OncoAlert 4Sight Abstracts to be Presented at #ESMO26 Efficacy and Safety of Atirmociclib + Fulvestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Progressed on Prior CDK4/6 Inhibitor in a Randomized Phase 2 Study (FOURLIGHT-1) @antgiorda 🔬 Randomized phase 2 (n=263): atirmociclib + fulvestrant vs investigator’s choice (fulvestrant or everolimus + exemestane) in HR+/HER2– mBC after prior CDK4/6i. Primary: investigator-assessed PFS. ➡️ Median PFS 9.4 vs 6.6 mo; HR 0.60 (0.440–0.825); 1-sided p=0.0007 ➡️ ORR in patients with measurable disease: 19.3% vs 11.3%; CBR: 61.9% vs 46.0% ➡️ Atirmociclib discontinuation due to TRAEs: 4.0%; most common TRAE neutropenia (46.4%) ✅ First next-generation CDKi to show significant and clinically meaningful PFS improvement after prior CDK4/6i, with a manageable safety profile. #BreastCancer 🎙️ Antonio Giordano (4Sight Made from Abstracts publicly available at the ESMO website) @matteolambe @aftimosp @E_de_Azambuja @DrSGraff @ErikaHamilton9 @hoperugo @stolaney1 @BianchiniGP @aftimosp @kevinpunie @ElisaAgostinett @to_be_elizabeth @GaiaGriguolo @JankovicK @raalbany @JavierCortesMD @JaniceTNBCmets @Prof_Nadia_H @LoiSher @jamecancerdoc @Lucarecco @Dr_Oncologista @guiandri76

  2. Mirrors of Medicine

    Looking forward to this one at #ESMO26 👀

    引用@

    OncoAlert 4Sight Abstracts to be Presented at #ESMO26 Efficacy and Safety of Atirmociclib + Fulvestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Progressed on Prior CDK4/6 Inhibitor in a Randomized Phase 2 Study (FOURLIGHT-1) @antgiorda 🔬 Randomized phase 2 (n=263): atirmociclib + fulvestrant vs investigator’s choice (fulvestrant or everolimus + exemestane) in HR+/HER2– mBC after prior CDK4/6i. Primary: investigator-assessed PFS. ➡️ Median PFS 9.4 vs 6.6 mo; HR 0.60 (0.440–0.825); 1-sided p=0.0007 ➡️ ORR in patients with measurable disease: 19.3% vs 11.3%; CBR: 61.9% vs 46.0% ➡️ Atirmociclib discontinuation due to TRAEs: 4.0%; most common TRAE neutropenia (46.4%) ✅ First next-generation CDKi to show significant and clinically meaningful PFS improvement after prior CDK4/6i, with a manageable safety profile. #BreastCancer 🎙️ Antonio Giordano (4Sight Made from Abstracts publicly available at the ESMO website) @matteolambe @aftimosp @E_de_Azambuja @DrSGraff @ErikaHamilton9 @hoperugo @stolaney1 @BianchiniGP @aftimosp @kevinpunie @ElisaAgostinett @to_be_elizabeth @GaiaGriguolo @JankovicK @raalbany @JavierCortesMD @JaniceTNBCmets @Prof_Nadia_H @LoiSher @jamecancerdoc @Lucarecco @Dr_Oncologista @guiandri76

    Same topic FOURLIGHT-1 · 26 people#BREASTCANCER421 views2 likes2 reposts0 replies
  3. MeDucation

    @ChandrakanthMv's seven-point breakdown makes FOURLIGHT-1 easy to teach. The nuance for fellows: atirmociclib is CDK4-selective, and sparing CDK6 is meant to ease the neutropenia t

    引用@

    FOURLIGHT-1 | ESMO 2026 Can CDK4 inhibition work after CDK4/6 progression? 1. Population: 263 patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer after prior CDK4/6 inhibitor. 2. Arms: Atirmociclib + fulvestrant vs investigator’s choice (fulvestrant or everolimus + exemestane). 3. Median PFS: 9.4 vs 6.6 months (HR 0.60). 4. ORR: 19.3% vs 11.3%. 5. Clinical benefit ≥24 weeks: 61.9% vs 46.0%. 6. Safety: Neutropenia 46.4%; leukopenia 32.8%; treatment-related discontinuation 4%. 7. Take-home: Promising phase II PFS benefit. OS immature; phase III confirmation needed. Ref: Giordano A, et al. FOURLIGHT-1. ESMO 2026; Abstract 1842O. #ESMO26 #BreastCancer #MVOnco

    Same topic FOURLIGHT-1 · 26 peopleatirmociclib56 views1 like0 reposts0 replies
CBACBA Frontier Insights (CFI)Chinese Biopharmaceutical Association (CBA)www.cba-usa.org

Disclaimer CBA Frontier Insights uses AI-assisted methods to aggregate, summarize, and analyze publicly accessible biopharmaceutical information. Content is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not represent the official views of original sources or affiliated organizations. AI-generated content may contain errors; please verify important information against primary sources. Intellectual property rights remain with their respective owners. For copyright concerns or corrections, please contact us through the website’s feedback page.