Skip to content
Dra. María Natalia Gandur Quiroga· @nataliagandur · X·· 2 days agoScore70

ramucirumab

Body · original

🚨 Not every negative phase III trial is clinically uninformative.

At #ESMO26, final results from RAMIRIS compared FOLFIRI + ramucirumab vs paclitaxel + ramucirumab as second-line therapy in taxane-pretreated advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

📊 n=317

➡️ Median OS: 8.7 vs 7.5 mo
HR 0.95, p=.33

➡️ ORR: 25.3% vs 22.6%
p=.29

➡️ Median PFS: 5.5 vs 3.7 mo
HR 0.70, p=.003

⚠️ Grade 3–5 AEs: 70% vs 68%

The co-primary endpoints were not met.

But the PFS signal is hard to ignore.

🎯 Why this matters: in taxane-pretreated GEA, FOLFIRI + ramucirumab may not replace paclitaxel + ramucirumab broadly, but it could still offer a meaningful alternative when prior taxane exposure, toxicity, neuropathy, or patient-specific factors make another taxane less attractive.

For me, this is exactly where personalized sequencing matters more than declaring a simple winner.

Pinging @CathyEngMD @BenWestphalen @graokane @NiuSanford @GillSharlene @pashtoonkasi @DrVilmaPBarcia @GIMedOnc @KoheiShitara @realbowtiedoc

#OncoAlert #ESMO26 #GastricCancer #GEA #GIOncology #PrecisionOncology

333 views · 9 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies

Conference abstracts
2878ROmatched by Rapid oral 1: Gastrointestinal tumour, upper digestive

FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab versus paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line therapy for taxane-pretreated patients with advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma–Final results of the phase III IKFs602/AIO RAMIRIS Study

https://esmocongress.esmo.org
引用@
OncoAlert 4Sight Abstracts to be Presented at #ESMO26 FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab Versus Paclitaxel Plus Ramucirumab as Second-Line Therapy for Taxane-Pretreated Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Final Results of the Phase III IKFs602/AIO RAMIRIS Study 🔬 Phase III (n=317): FOLFIRI + ramucirumab vs paclitaxel + ramucirumab, second-line, in taxane-pretreated advanced GEA. Co-primary endpoints: OS and ORR. ➡️ Median OS 8.7 vs 7.5 mo; HR 0.95; p=.33 ➡️ ORR 25.3% vs 22.6% (p=.29); median PFS 5.5 vs 3.7 mo, HR 0.7 (p=.003) ➡️ Grade 3–5 AEs 70% vs 68% ✅ Co-primary endpoints were not met; PFS was clearly improved, supporting personalized treatment decisions in taxane-pretreated advanced GEA. 🎙️ Magdalena Scheck (4Sight Made from Abstracts publicly available at the ESMO website) Pinging OncoAlert Faculty @CathyEngMD, @BenWestphalen, @graokane, @NiuSanford, , @GillSharlene, @pashtoonkasi, @DrVilmaPBarcia, @Erman_Akkus, @GIMedOnc, @UOzkerim, @MarioBalsaMD, @p_ciracimd, @DraMartinezLago, @DaisukeKotani, @Aiims1742, @ARosen380, @realbowtiedoc, @KoheiShitara,
在 X 查看被引用的帖子

Source: Dra. María Natalia Gandur Quiroga · x.com

CBACBA Frontier Insights (CFI)Chinese Biopharmaceutical Association (CBA)www.cba-usa.org