Skip to content
Oncology Brothers· @OncBrothers · X·· 1 day agoScore70

ARTEMIS-011

Body · original

Day 4 (Presidential III) #ESMO26 highlights:

1. ARTEMIS-011: Risvutatug rezetecan (B7-H3 ADC) in osteosarcoma

2. MOIO: ⬇️ frequency IO in responders

3. TroFuse-005: Sac-TMT in ndometrial Ca

4. KEYNOTE-C93: Pembro mono in 1L dMMR Endometrial Ca

#OncTwitter @myESMO

1/5

263 views · 3 likes · 5 reposts · 4 replies

Conference abstracts
Replies in this thread
  1. Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

    4. KEYNOTE-C93: PhIII, pembro mono vs carbo/paclitaxel in 1L dMMR advanced/recurrent endometrial ca - mPFS 38.2 vs 8.4 mo (HR 0.57) - G≥3 TRAEs 18.1% vs 50.7% - DoR NR vs 10.2 mo - OS immature. IO/ICI regardless of aite, in dMMR, this remains the preferred backbone. 5/5

  2. Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

    3. TroFuse-005: PhIII, sacituzumab tirumotecan (TROP2 ADC) vs dox/paclitaxel in endometrial ca after platinum + IO (n=776), global study - mOS 19.0 vs 12.1 mos (HR 0.68) - mPFS 7.2 vs 3.9 mos (HR 0.59) - ORR 35.1% vs 17.3% - When available, new option post IO-Chemo 4/5

  3. Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

    2. MOIO: PhIII, non-inferiority of reduced-frequency (q3mo) vs standard IO in responders with advanced cancer - PFS 25 vs 21.9 mo (HR 1.35) - Death HR 2.0 - No clear safety gain. This is disappointing to see. We need more guidance on who we can de-escalate IO for. 3/5

  4. Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

    1. ARTEMIS-011: PhIII Ris-Rez (B7-H3 ADC) vs gem/docetaxel in heavily pretreated R/R osteosarcoma (n=122, 🇨🇳 only) - mPFS 5.5 vs 1.4 mos (HR 0.33) - OS trend HR 0.51 (immature) - TEAEs 92.5% vs 83.3% - Need global studies and better management for AEs 2/5

Source: Oncology Brothers · x.com

CBACBA Frontier Insights (CFI)Chinese Biopharmaceutical Association (CBA)www.cba-usa.org

Disclaimer CBA Frontier Insights uses AI-assisted methods to aggregate, summarize, and analyze publicly accessible biopharmaceutical information. Content is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not represent the official views of original sources or affiliated organizations. AI-generated content may contain errors; please verify important information against primary sources. Intellectual property rights remain with their respective owners. For copyright concerns or corrections, please contact us through the website’s feedback page.