Skip to content
N Engl J Med·· 22 hours agoPickScore71

Intermittent or Continuous Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury.

Intermittent or Continuous Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury.

In brief

Starting renal-replacement therapy with intermittent hemodialysis rather than continuous renal-replacement therapy was not noninferior in critically ill adults with acute kidney injury. The trial stopped early after 554 patients were randomized because of higher mortality with intermittent hemodialysis: day-90 death occurred in 63.1% versus 53.5%, and major adverse kidney events in 78.1% versus 71.6%. Clinicians choosing an initial modality now have mortality evidence favoring continuous therapy.

Why it matters

It gives clinicians comparative mortality evidence for choosing the initial renal-replacement modality in acute kidney injury.

Source: N Engl J Med · doi.org

CBACBA Frontier Insights (CFI)Chinese Biopharmaceutical Association (CBA)www.cba-usa.org