Results from KEYNOTE-B49: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of pembrolizumab (pembro) vs placebo (pbo) plus chemotherapy (CT) in participants (pts) with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC)
https://esmocongress.esmo.org
ESMO Congress 2026
October 23–27, 2026 · Madrid · 3132 items
KEYNOTE-B49
Late-breaking18 people · 28 posts · 1 abstract
Heat trend for this story
Heat now 8·Peak in the comparable set 13 (Oct 24 17:00)·Change over 24h in the comparable set –·Participants now 16
Within the breast cancer immunotherapy landscape, the evidence base for the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy currently rests in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): this combination has received FDA approval for both PD-L1 positive metastatic and early-stage TNBC [1], and PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy has demonstrated efficacy in both early and advanced TNBC trials, leading to approvals [2]. In the large HR+/HER2− population, endocrine therapy (ET) remains the cornerstone, and CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET have become the standard of care in advanced HR+ breast cancer, but resistance inevitably occurs, leaving a clear unmet need in later lines [5]; whether checkpoint inhibitors can be extended to HR+/HER2− disease remains an area of active investigation [1][2].
KEYNOTE-B49, reported at ESMO26, directly tests this question: in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1, HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer previously treated with ET, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was compared with chemotherapy alone. The numbers from the floor: PFS of 6.7 vs 6.0 months (HR 0.74), and OS of 21.0 vs 22.2 months (HR 1.04), meaning no overall survival advantage and a numerically lower value; in the CPS ≥10 population the PFS HR was 0.59, suggesting greater benefit in the enriched subgroup, and the posting expert noted he looks forward to the subgroup analyses presented at ESMO. The same expert commented that in the ADC era, this modest PFS benefit without an OS advantage has little clinical relevance to him, and that evaluating immunotherapy in combination with ADCs or after ADC treatment may be more rational; separately, CancerNetwork listed KEYNOTE-B49 among 6 breast cancer trials to watch at this ESMO, alongside novel ADCs.
Relative to prior knowledge, KEYNOTE-B49 moves the evidence for checkpoint inhibitors in HR+/HER2− breast cancer one step forward: against a backdrop where approvals and major positive data have centered on TNBC and HR+ disease has only been exploratory [1][2], it delivers a randomized readout of adding pembrolizumab to chemotherapy in this population, and the lower PFS HR at CPS ≥10 is directionally consistent with the established PD-L1-selected approval logic for pembrolizumab [1]. The poster's proposal of IO+ADC combinations or sequencing after ADC also echoes the background literature, where ADCs are FDA approved for TNBC and HER2+ disease and are being studied in combination with checkpoint inhibitors [1].
As for limitations, the available information comes only from a conference floor post; safety data, prior CDK4/6 inhibitor exposure, P values, and statistical design details are undisclosed; OS numerically disfavored the combination arm (21.0 vs 22.2 months); full results and subgroup analyses should await formal publication, and this interpretation does not constitute investment or clinical advice.
- 1.Current and future immunotherapy for breast cancer · J Hematol Oncol 2024
- 2.Immunotherapy in breast cancer: current landscape and emerging trends · Exp Hematol Oncol 2025
- 3.Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of Current Curative Intent Therapies · Curr Oncol 2022
- 4.GATA2 Regulates Constitutive PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression in Brain Tumors · Sci Rep 2020
- 5.The Evolving Pathways of the Efficacy of and Resistance to CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer · Cancers (Basel) 2023
- 6.Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer: finding the individual balance · ESMO Open 2025
Yüksel Ürün@DrYukselUrun Another reminder that immunotherapy is not a universal solution.
引用@Keynote B49 - pembrolizumab does not work much in this Hr positive Her2 negative MBC population( endocrine resistant ) @myESMO @dr_yakupergun @OncoAlert #esmo26
Aya Mohamed | MSc, MD 🎗@Dr_Oncologista Yakup Ergün@dr_yakupergun Gaia Griguolo@GaiaGriguolo KEYNOTE-B49 presented by @hoperugo at #ESMO26
Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD@to_be_elizabeth 📌 Proffered paper 2: Breast cancer, early and advanced stage
Elvina Almuradova@Dr_ElvinaA Jacob Plieth@JacobPlieth Kazuki Nozawa, MD@kazuki_nozawa Annals of Oncology@Annals_Oncology CancerNetwork®@CancerNetwrk Carmen Criscitiello@CarmenCriscit #ESMO26 @myESMO #ESMOAmbassords new data from Keynote-b49 👇🏼
引用@🔥 KEYNOTE-B49 meets its primary endpoint, but benefit seems limited to few patients 👉 ICIs benefit selected ER+/HER2− BC pts (CPS≥10, ER-low) 👉 Are ADCs better ICI partners than CT? 👉 What about PD-1/VEGF bispecifics? ➡️ Better biomarkers urgently needed! #ESMO26
Yakup Ergün@dr_yakupergun #ESMO26 | KEYNOTE-B49 – Phase III
引用@#ESMO26 | KEYNOTE-B49 In patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1, HR+/HER2− mBC previously treated with ET, pembro + chemo was compared with chemo - PFS: 6.7 vs 6.0 mo (HR 0.74) - OS: 21.0 vs 22.2 mo (HR 1.04) - CPS ≥10: PFS HR 0.59 I’m curious to see the subgroup analyses presented at ESMO. However, in the ADC era, this modest PFS benefit without an OS advantage has little clinical relevance to me. Evaluating immunotherapy in combination with ADCs or after ADC treatment may be more rational in today's treatment landscape.
ESMO - Eur. Oncology@myESMO Same topic KEYNOTE-B49 · 18 peoplepembrolizumab#ADVANCEDBREASTCANCER#CLINICALTRIAL#BREASTCANCER#INSIGHTSBYESMO302 views1 like0 reposts0 repliesTargeted Oncology@TargetedOnc Targeted Oncology@TargetedOnc Live from #ESMO26 Madrid with @TargetedOnc!
Same topic KEYNOTE-B49 · 18 peopleGY020INTERPATH-001VOLGADELLPHI-305DASL-HICAP64 views0 likes1 repost0 repliesScienceLink@sciencelinkonco #ScienceLink #Madrid2026 #ESMO26 #KEYNOTEB49 #CancerDeMama
Same topic KEYNOTE-B49 · 18 peoplepembrolizumabHER2#SCIENCELINK#MADRID2026#KEYNOTEB49#CANCERDEMAMA27 views0 likes0 reposts0 repliesMustafa Özdoğan, MD@ozdogan_md STATISTICALLY POSITIVE. CLINICALLY THIN.
Giampaolo Bianchini@BianchiniGP 🔥 KEYNOTE-B49 meets its primary endpoint, but benefit seems limited to few patients
Targeted Oncology@TargetedOnc KEYNOTE-B49 highlights an important distinction:
Targeted Oncology@TargetedOnc For my breast oncology colleagues:
Targeted Oncology@TargetedOnc One question I would ask the KEYNOTE-B49 investigators:
Targeted Oncology@TargetedOnc KEYNOTE-B49 raises a familiar oncology dilemma:
Targeted Oncology@TargetedOnc Could PD-L1 selection be the real story in KEYNOTE-B49?
Targeted Oncology@TargetedOnc An important question for KEYNOTE-B49 at #ESMO26:
Targeted Oncology@TargetedOnc Where does KEYNOTE-B49 fit in today’s rapidly evolving breast cancer landscape?
Targeted Oncology@TargetedOnc KEYNOTE-B49 at #ESMO26 raises a fundamental question: